What

Where

Trusted Across Michigan

2,500

+

Verified Listings

Built for Clients & Attorneys

Every Practice Area

Your Search Starts Here:
Michigan Top Lawyers makes it simple to find the right attorney.

Our Top Rated Lawyers

Popular Exclusive Listings In Our Directory

The Elder Care Firm

The Elder Care Firm

Be the first one to rate!

860 W Grand River Ave

Practice Areas : Elder Law

Seva Law Firm

Be the first one to rate!

1050 Wilshire Suite 335 Troy, MI 48084

Practice Areas : Insurance

Giarmarco, Mullins & Horton, P.C.

Giarmarco, Mullins & Horton, P.C.

Be the first one to rate!

101 West Big Beaver Road 10th Floor Columbia Center Troy, Michigan 48084

Practice Areas : Commercial Real Estate

Freel Professional Corp

Freel Professional Corp

Be the first one to rate!

540 West Lake St., Suite 2 Tawas City, MI 48763

Practice Areas : Admiralty and Maritime Law

Davis Law Group PLLC

Davis Law Group PLLC

Be the first one to rate!

27600 Northwestern Hwy Ste 215 Southfield, MI 48034

Practice Areas : Criminal Law

Kathryn Wayne-Spindler & Associates

Kathryn Wayne-Spindler & Associates

Be the first one to rate!

425 West Huron Street, Suite 120 Milford, MI 48381

Practice Areas : Criminal Law

How it Works

It’s easy to find and book a lawyer and also to share your experience.

Find Your Lawyer

Find Your Lawyer

Explore top Michigan lawyers by city, practice area, and reviews.

Contact a Lawyer

Contact a Lawyer

Connect with trusted Michigan attorneys for fast, reliable help.

Review A Lawyer

Review A Lawyer

Rate Michigan lawyers and guide others to the best legal support.

Browse Lawyers

Find the Michigan Attorney for YOU!

Real Reviews from Clients

Across Michigan

Michigan Legal News

Tribal Orgs Amicus Brief Supporting Cert in Trespass Petition

Tribal Orgs Amicus Brief Supporting Cert in Trespass Petition

Here is the amicus brief in Aubol v. Andeavor Logistics LLP: Amicus Brief of Indian Land Tenure FoundationDownload Petition here. Source link

October 23, 2026

Attorneys – Fees – Individual liability

Attorneys – Fees – Individual liability

Where a plaintiff law firm has brought a fee-collection action, an individual defendant is entitled to summary disposition despite the plaintiff’s theory is that the defendant made an independent personal promise to pay the plaintiff’s fees. “This matter is before the Court on Defendant Mordechai Grun’s Motion for Summary Disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7), (C)(8), and (C)(10). … “This fee-collection action arises from Plaintiff Cohen, Lerner & Rabinovitz, P.C.’s (‘Plaintiff”) legal representation of Defendant Vascular Management Services of Novi, LLC (‘VMSN’) in an Oakland County Circuit Court action, captioned Vascular Management Services of Novi, LLC et al. v. EMG Partners, LLC et al., Oakland County Circuit Court Case No. 2021-191539-CB (‘Underlying Case’). Plaintiff seeks $107,675.65 in unpaid legal fees, asserting claims for breach of contract, account stated, and quantum meruit against VMSN and Defendant Mordechai Grun (‘Grun’) individually. … “On or about December 9, 2021, Plaintiff was retained to represent VMSN in the Underlying Case. The named plaintiffs were VMSN and VCOA Management, LLC. Defendant Grun was not a named party but served as VMSN’s sole Manager. Plaintiff represented VMSN in the Underlying Case until withdrawing as counsel on July 24, 2025. … “Grun moves for summary disposition, arguing that the Complaint does not allege that he personally contracted with Plaintiff or otherwise assumed individual responsibility for VMSN’s legal fees. … “Plaintiff responds that Grun made a separate, personal promise to pay its fees and relies on interrogatory responses, communications, payments, and deposition testimony concerning that alleged promise. Grun replies that Plaintiff did not allege such a promise in the Complaint. … “Plaintiff’s present theory is that Grun made an independent personal promise to pay Plaintiff’s fees. … “The Complaint, however, does not allege such a promise. Instead, it refers to VMSN and Grun collectively as the ‘Co-Defendants’ and alleges that the ‘Co-Defendants’ retained Plaintiff, agreed to pay Plaintiff’s fees, and breached that agreement. … The Complaint does not allege that Grun individually retained Plaintiff, personally promised to pay Plaintiff’s fees, agreed to be personally responsible for VMSN’s obligation, or otherwise undertook an obligation independent of VMSN. “Plaintiff relies upon interrogatory responses and other evidence concerning Grun’s communications and payments to establish the alleged personal promise. … But those materials are not pleadings and cannot supply allegations missing from the Complaint for purposes of a motion under MCR 2.116(C)(8). … “Accordingly, the Complaint, as presently pleaded, fails to state a breach-of-contract claim against Grun individually. Defendant’s Motion is therefore GRANTED pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8) as to Count I.” Cohen, Lerner & Rabinovitz v. Vascular Mgmt. Serv. of Novi, LLC; MiLW No. 10-111300, 7 pages; Oakland Circuit Court; Valentine, J. Source link

October 22, 2026

“Nibi Anishinaabe Ikwewag Inaakonigewin: Water as a Sacred Spirit and the Role of Indigenous Women in Water Governance” — Nov. 4, 2026, UMich

“Nibi Anishinaabe Ikwewag Inaakonigewin: Water as a Sacred Spirit and the Role of Indigenous Women in Water Governance” — Nov. 4, 2026, UMich

“Nibi Anishinaabe Ikwewag Inaakonigewin: Water as a Sacred Spirit and the Role of Indigenous Women in Water Governance” — Nov. 4, 2026, UMich Source link

October 22, 2026

Featured in

AI Lawyer Finder

© 2025 Michigan Top Lawyers. All Rights Reserved. Powered by SolutionsPal | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service