What

Where

Trusted Across Michigan

2,500

+

Verified Listings

Built for Clients & Attorneys

Every Practice Area

Your Search Starts Here:
Michigan Top Lawyers makes it simple to find the right attorney.

Our Top Rated Lawyers

Popular Exclusive Listings In Our Directory

The Elder Care Firm

The Elder Care Firm

Be the first one to rate!

860 W Grand River Ave

Practice Areas : Elder Law

Seva Law Firm

Be the first one to rate!

1050 Wilshire Suite 335 Troy, MI 48084

Practice Areas : Insurance

Giarmarco, Mullins & Horton, P.C.

Giarmarco, Mullins & Horton, P.C.

Be the first one to rate!

101 West Big Beaver Road 10th Floor Columbia Center Troy, Michigan 48084

Practice Areas : Commercial Real Estate

Freel Professional Corp

Freel Professional Corp

Be the first one to rate!

540 West Lake St., Suite 2 Tawas City, MI 48763

Practice Areas : Admiralty and Maritime Law

Davis Law Group PLLC

Davis Law Group PLLC

Be the first one to rate!

27600 Northwestern Hwy Ste 215 Southfield, MI 48034

Practice Areas : Criminal Law

Kathryn Wayne-Spindler & Associates

Kathryn Wayne-Spindler & Associates

Be the first one to rate!

425 West Huron Street, Suite 120 Milford, MI 48381

Practice Areas : Criminal Law

How it Works

It’s easy to find and book a lawyer and also to share your experience.

Find Your Lawyer

Find Your Lawyer

Explore top Michigan lawyers by city, practice area, and reviews.

Contact a Lawyer

Contact a Lawyer

Connect with trusted Michigan attorneys for fast, reliable help.

Review A Lawyer

Review A Lawyer

Rate Michigan lawyers and guide others to the best legal support.

Browse Lawyers

Find the Michigan Attorney for YOU!

Real Reviews from Clients

Across Michigan

Michigan Legal News

Job Postings 11/5/26

Job Postings 11/5/26

2027 Virtual Spring Law Clerk Position Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians Civil Trial Court and Court of Appeals, Remote The Rincon Virtual Spring Law Clerk will be working in the leading tribal courts in the country under the direct supervision of Rincon’s tribal judges. The 2027 Spring Law Clerk will work on projects related to tribal court development and perform designated duties involving legal research and writing. Must be currently enrolled as a 2L or 3L at an ABA accredited law school. Academic Credit Open until filled https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:VA6C2:a51380c7-8141-497c-9c17-83b196d85bab Attorney Advisor – Indian Probate NEW Solutions, Inc., Remote Enrollees will support the Probate Hearings Division Administrative Law Judges (ALJ) and Indian Probate Judges (IPJ) for in-person or virtual hearings to resolve backlogged Indian probate cases. •Act as duly appointed master under the supervision of ALJs and IPJs in Indian… Source link

November 7, 2026

Unambiguous ERISA plan bars additional life insurance benefits

Unambiguous ERISA plan bars additional life insurance benefits

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan held that a surviving spouse could not recover an additional $250,000 in life insurance benefits because the governing ERISA plan unambiguously prohibited the deceased employee from electing $300,000 in coverage. The plaintiff sought benefits under his late husband’s supplemental life insurance plan. While employed by the defendant, the employee elected $300,000 in coverage and premiums consistent with that election were withheld from his paycheck. After his death, however, the plan’s claims administrator determined that he had been enrolled for only $50,000 because his salary made him ineligible for the maximum coverage. The plaintiff alleged that the employer misled the employee into believing he had successfully elected $300,000 in coverage and failed to notify him that he was ineligible. After unsuccessful attempts to obtain relief from the employer, the plaintiff sued under ERISA. An earlier breach-of-fiduciary-duty theory failed because the requested monetary recovery was not an available equitable remedy from the employer’s general assets. The amended complaint instead sought benefits due under the plan and statutory penalties for the employer’s alleged failure to provide requested plan documents. The court concluded that the plan documents unambiguously barred an employee earning the decedent’s salary from electing $300,000 in coverage. Precedent did not permit modification of those clear terms absent extraordinary circumstances, which were not present. The plaintiff also was not entitled to statutory penalties for the employer’s failure to respond to document requests because he had not shown resulting prejudice. The source indicates that the employer failed to appear, but the plaintiff nevertheless was not entitled to the requested relief under either theory. Relief denied. The 15-page opinion is Thomas v. UACJ Automotive Whitehall Industries, Inc., Lawyers Weekly No. 03-111335. Source link

November 7, 2026

Maine Law School 2026 Indian Law & History Lecture

Maine Law School 2026 Indian Law & History Lecture

Date: Friday, November 20, 2026 Event Schedule: 12:00 PM – 12:30 PM: Lunch 12:30 PM – 2:00 PM: Lecture Location: University of Maine School of Law300 Fore StreetPortland, ME 04101 REGISTER HERE. Source link

November 6, 2026

Featured in

AI Lawyer Finder

© 2025 Michigan Top Lawyers. All Rights Reserved. Powered by SolutionsPal | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service